NHL Midseason Review: Los Angeles Kings
As the NHL season reaches its midpoint, teams and their performances come under scrutiny, presenting an essential moment for reflection. The Los Angeles Kings find themselves echoing a narrative that many fans are all too familiar with: a competitive roster that struggles to convince onlookers regarding their playoff viability. Despite the talent that resides within the organization, questions linger about whether they can navigate a successful playoff journey, something they haven’t achieved in over a decade.
Just a year prior, Jim Hiller, at the helm of the team’s coaching staff, led the Kings to a franchise-record performance, signaling a promising future. However, this season tells a different story. The team’s power play has plummeted to one of the worst in the league, and they are currently positioned outside playoff contention. While their recent series victory over the Minnesota Wild was a glimmer of potential, inconsistencies in performance continue to haunt the Kings, as they struggle to establish a winning culture.
Currently, Los Angeles sits in fifth place, desperately vying for a playoff spot amid a highly competitive Western Conference where every point counts. Here’s a comprehensive midseason evaluation of the Kings, assessing their current standing and likely trajectory as the season progresses.
Performance Evaluation
Overall Performance: C
Though not devoid of skill, the Kings’ play has elements lacking conviction, raising doubts about their postseason prospects. They have hovered near the playoff cut line, plagued by failure to maintain leads and inconsistent effort levels. At this stage, the Kings appear significantly below average, seeming more mediocre than their record might imply, with a real possibility of yet another early playoff exit.
Offensive Output: C+
On paper, the Kings boast a lineup brimming with scoring potential featuring talents like Adrian Kempe, Quinton Byfield, and Kevin Fiala. Yet, their actual offensive output has been disappointing, ranking near the bottom in goals scored and shooting efficiency. While the roster suggests stronger capabilities, coaching and lineup management seem to hinder their execution, suffering from an inability to sustain pressure and generate consistent scoring. Early leads prove advantageous for the Kings, but trailing early often spells trouble, leading to a lack of comebacks.
Defensive Play: B-
The Kings’ defensive style has remained consistent; however, lapses appear, especially in high-pressure moments. Veteran Drew Doughty continues to play substantial minutes, while younger defenders like Brandt Clarke and Mikey Anderson showcase promise yet are prone to lapses. Ranking fifth in goals allowed per game, middle-of-the-pack performance is offset by a low ranking in penalty killing, exposing them to critical losses later in games due to late penalties and failure to thwart power play opportunities.
Goaltending: B+
Darcy Kuemper’s sporadic presence due to injury has influenced his performance metrics this season. When healthy, he has proven difficult to score against, holding a record of 12 wins, 7 losses, and 6 overtime losses, alongside a decent save percentage. However, overall inconsistency in the goaltending position means that for the Kings to face strong playoff contenders, they will need Kuemper to be at his best.
Special Teams: D
This area is particularly concerning, adversely affecting the Kings’ playoff aspirations. The power play’s dire statistics have drawn public ire towards Hiller, and the overall execution of special teams remains a glaring weakness, with a ranking of 27th in power play percentage. Poor penalty kills have further compounded their woes, leading to critical late-game mistakes and losses against other teams. The consequences can shift playoff momentum dramatically, as seen in past series where special teams failures led to squandered opportunities.
Coaching Strategy: D
Hiller’s struggles to adapt strategies post-losses have raised alarms, especially given last year’s achievements. Misalignment between coaching intentions and player execution could undermine players’ confidence and disrupt on-ice chemistry. Such disconnects may become glaring weaknesses during playoff matchups, setting Los Angeles up for potential early exits.
Looking Ahead
In a best-case scenario, the Kings rectify their special teams’ efforts, find offensive rhythm, and enter the playoffs with momentum. A successful first-round series remains a conceivable goal if circumstances align favorably. The likely outcome, on the other hand, involves a lower seed facing tough competition from a formidable Western opponent, reminiscent of previous playoff defeats.
Conversely, the worst-case forecast involves another early playoff elimination, intensifying inquiries into the necessity for a potential rebuild of this roster.
In conclusion, as the Kings navigate the second half of the season, they have an opportunity to redefine their trajectory. Whether they can emerge as a formidable playoff contender or face the prospects of rebuilding remains to be seen. The next stretch of games will be critical in determining not just their postseason fate, but also the future of the franchise itself.
For further deep dives into NHL analysis and updates, including access to exclusive articles, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free.
